PLEASE ONLY POST - Articles, Official Letters, Testimony, Rules and Regs. Moe - perhaps a Sticky is

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
I have to admit the need to use the horizontal scroll-bar to read the posts or to get to the 'quote button' on these EXTRA-wide posts is an annoyance and I'm less-likely to read the entire post when it is in this format...

BUT I suspect that Thanks2u has not done this intentionally. I'm not even certain of how the problem is being created in these posts. I'm not sure if Pants sees any additional problem beyond the format one. But obviously, my post has now 'inherited' the same format problem.
Thanks SO-CAL-GAL

I am not computer savvy ... So I really have NO IDEA what the problem is even suppose to be on this issue, I really have ZERO idea what this is in reference to ..

All the posts I see on Loansafe have no issues whatsoever

All post are clearly readable and have no "format" issues. Whatever format means

All my posts look 100 % fine to me

100 % of everyone elses pots look perfectly fine to me, so perhaps this is an issue that does not truley deserve any time ?
 

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
Hmm

I kind of get the issue is screens are not wide enough now for some reason.

I have no idea, as I have not changed anything on my computer and I see all the posts just fine.

The banners on the left are a bit of an annoyance, that could be a problem for anyone who does not have a 17 inch wide screen, as I do?

I really have no answer, as this appears to be is computer programming technical issue and I only know hoe to plug this thing in and hit the power button basically

Sorry
 

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
I just wrote to Paul Kiel and asked him why I never see articles regarding the SUSTAINABLITY of these so called permanent modifications..

I beleive the banks are insidiously and intentionally Swindling homeowners again into loans that will eventually become loans the homeowners can not afford.

The Modifications look good at first glance because they start out to be affordable, / rates of 2 % and 3 % but after 5 to 7 years, MANY homeowners will NOT be able to afford the increased interest rates of 5 % 6 % and 7 + % which the so called good modifications will inflict upon them.

I know we all hope we will be in FAT *** Money City in 3 to 5 years, but I think we are all in for a VERY RUDE AWAKENING !!

Logjam Continues for Loan Mods; Big Banks Fare Poorly, Data Show - ProPublica
 

davephx

LoanSafe Member
On the wide screen. Weird. It has now cleared up for me on a when went to a new page. But page 12 is totally screwed up with huge wide spacing. We didn't do it!!

Some see and some don't see the problem it seems.

OK I just tested it again. Using Firefox that I almost always use I see the very wide screen on page 12. However, if I switch to IE it is regular size.

This page is normal for me on both FF and IE.
 

so-cal-gal

LoanSafe Member
Hmm

I kind of get the issue is screens are not wide enough now for some reason.

I have no idea, as I have not changed anything on my computer and I see all the posts just fine.

The banners on the left are a bit of an annoyance, that could be a problem for anyone who does not have a 17 inch wide screen, as I do?

I really have no answer, as this appears to be is computer programming technical issue and I only know hoe to plug this thing in and hit the power button basically

Sorry
I use FireFox and I have a SUPER BIG SCREEN. This page appears normal only while I'm viewing the posts. When I'm inserting a post, like now, I had to scroll to the right to even get to the 'box' to enter this comment. And when I'm previewing the post, no line-wraps are inserted. I have to scroll back and forth on this wide screen to read the content because, until I insert a carriage-return (enter button), the content just stays on the same line in the preview box.

Now when I actually POST this comment, I expect it to look okay in FF, since this 'page' has not 'goofed-up' yet.
 
L

laldana

Guest
Mortgage Nightmare: Who Owns My Loan?

Interesting article:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Economy/story?id=7682039&page=3

Good reader comments at the end and an opportunity to contact the editors of ABC news with similar stories.

QUOTE:
"The fact of the matter is that these investors have bought off the members of Congress. … The Senate is bought and paid for by these banks," Marks said. "They're forcing people into foreclosure because they want the cash."
 

davephx

LoanSafe Member
so-cal-gal
If yes quote I can't even type in the huge box with huge scroll using FF. Only way I can post is quick reply and is normal sized on this page as long as don't quote.

Just so others know its not their system but a forum issue.

BTW this almost unheard of in Phoenix but have a hooked echo on radar N Scottsdale with a Tornado warning. Reports of 80 mph straight line winds and more rain in last 3 days than we get in a year.

I was more use to this kind of weather in Minneapolis 25 yrs ago!
 

litton nightmares

LoanSafe Member
Frank to Recommend Replacing Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (Update4) Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A


By Dawn Kopecki and Alison Vekshin




Jan. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Representative Barney Frank, whose committee oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said he will push to do away with the companies in favor of a different model for U.S. mortgage financing.
“The committee will be recommending abolishing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in their current form and coming up with a whole new system of housing finance,†Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said at a hearing in Washington today. “That’s the approach, rather than a piecemeal one.â€
The companies, the largest sources of money for U.S. home loans, were seized by regulators almost 17 months ago because of their risk of failing and have since survived on $110.6 billion in taxpayer-funded aid. Frank said Congress also needs to figure out what to do with the remaining shareholders in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as well as investors in the companies’ $5.4 trillion in mortgage bonds and $1.7 trillion in unsecured corporate debt.
“That will be one of the things we will be talking about,†Frank told reporters after the hearing. “The stockholders were of course already pretty much beaten up.â€
The U.S. Treasury Department took an 80 percent equity stake in each company as part of the government’s September 2008 takeover, which wiped out the majority of common and preferred share values. Fannie Mae common shares, which peaked at $87.81 in December 2000, fell today 8 cents, or 7.5 percent, to 99 cents in regular New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Freddie Mac, which reached an all- time high of $73.70 in December 2004, dropped 14 cents, or 11 percent, to $1.17.
Housing Finance
Washington-based Fannie Mae, which dates back to the 1930s, and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac, started in 1970, were chartered by the government primarily to lower the cost of homeownership. They buy mortgages from lenders, freeing up cash at banks to make more loans. They make money by financing mortgage-asset purchases with low-cost debt and on guarantees of home-loan securities they create out of loans from lenders.
The companies now own or guarantee more than $5 trillion in U.S. residential debt, and were responsible for as much as 75 percent of the new mortgages made last year.
Congress hasn’t made any decisions on how to restructure the U.S. home-loan market and will hold hearings before proposing any change, Frank said.
Market Function
“We’re going to look at the whole question of housing finance,†Frank said. “Sorting out the function of promoting liquidity in the market, and also the secondary market in general but then also doing some kind of subsidy for affordability.â€
“I don’t know anybody who thinks Fannie and Freddie should continue,†he said.
Mortgage investors “shrugged off the news†today, said Nicholas Strand, a mortgage-bond analyst at Barclays Capital in New York. As Congress begins debating the issue in earnest this year, he said “you might see some concern by mortgage investors reflected in the pricing, but you’re not seeing that today.â€
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been run for more than 40 years as shareholder-owned companies that also have a federally chartered mission to promote the housing market. Those dual mandates have collided and contributed to the companies’ failure, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said in a December interview.
‘Cold, Hard Look’
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in an interview yesterday that he doesn’t think Congress will be able to pass legislation restructuring the companies until next year.
“We are committed to propose a set of detailed reforms beginning this year,†Geithner said in an interview on “PBS NewsHour.†“I don’t think we’re going to be able to legislate that until that process can start until next year, because it’s just a complicated thing to get right.â€
“But we are completely supportive and agree completely with the need to make sure that we take a cold, hard look at what the future of those institutions should be in our country,†he said in the interview.
Fannie Mae has posted $120.5 billion in net losses in the nine quarters ended in September and requested $59.9 billion in Treasury aid to remain solvent. Freddie Mac has lost $67.9 billion and sought $50.7 billion in taxpayer-funded aid.
To contact the reporter on this story: Dawn Kopecki in Washington at [email protected]; Alison Vekshin in Washington at [email protected].
Last Updated: January 22, 2010 16:09 EST
 

ama125

LoanSafe Member
I know this is posted elsewhere, but since this is the place for articles and such, I will post this here:
Bank of America Becomes First Mortgage Servicer to Sign Contract for Home Affordable Second-Lien Modification... -- CALABASAS, Calif., Jan. 26 /PRNewswire/ --

This may explain the recect change in status on my second mortgage, now saying approved though I was told this would not happen until the first got modded. Well, the first is approved for HAMP but the trial still has not started. So, I can only speculate that this is related to the approval on the second loan. I am hoping to speak to my negotiator today to get the scoop and verify if this is 2MP or not.
 

davephx

LoanSafe Member
hmmm

2MP requires a HAMP mod first on 1st. It would be nice if they did ahead of HAMP. Or, for all the folks that were denied HAMP but instead got a similar inhouse mod, but not HAMP. My concern was the internal would not qualify for 2MP now that at least it has one participant. I also have a 2nd with BofA (previously Countrywide, previously Citi which has my 1st).
 

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
Some true info from MSNDRSTOOD

I just thought I would add some of the stupid things we're told...with commentary, of course. :cool:

Feel free to add your own.


1. Its in underwriting...(and we only have so many, so wait your turn)

2. Its under review...(means we glance over at it once in a while)

3. Its waiting for signatures...(after we find a pen)

4. Its waiting for investors...(to screw ya after we get done with ya)

5. Its...its...somewhere on somebodies desk who doesn't give a sh*t

6. Dontcha know we're overwhelmed? (there are only so many ways we can say NO!)

7. We're working as fast as we can (to burn your *ss and take your money)

8. You haven't sent in your paperwork...(oh, we got it... and then deleted it, hahahaha)

9. Keep making those trial payments...(We want every last dime you have before we snatch your house too)

10. We're waiting on guidance from Treasury...(who's driving this train and when can I get off with my permanent mod?)
 

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by msm859
Okay speech. Talking about job creation without talking about stopping foreclosures is just spitting in the wind. If you want to create jobs STOP the foreclosures -- modify the loans. Then we will see real job growth when construction can get going again.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
MSM859 said

Okay speech. Talking about job creation without talking about stopping foreclosures is just spitting in the wind. If you want to create jobs STOP the foreclosures -- modify the loans. Then we will see real job growth when construction can get going again.<!-- google_ad_section_end -->


Thanks2u writes

VERY TRUE - RIGHT ON MSM859 - YOU SAID IT !

HIS SPEECH WAS PURE LIP SERVICE FOR THE MOST PART

He has fantastic speech writers though.

Except for when he let his writers put in the parts about polluting our country with more offshore oil drilling, Nuclear power plant radiation and Toxic coal mining and burning.... What a JERK !

But his voice is so Luther King mesmerizing and his body language so Abe Lincoln strong that he could have also said - - I have a DREAM, "cook you dogs & cats for food when you don't have enough money for food, because us American Folks are a resiliant people...... And still everyone there would have clapped for him and people at home would have blindly nodded yes, yes, so true...

Like robots and zombies

All he said about real estate basically was - We're trying the Refinance approach & now we're moving on to health care...

BLAH BLAH he said nothing about foreclosures or HAMP and all the pain and suffering of millions of distressed homeowners who are facing imminent foreclosures, with or without low paying far in the future jobs or not....

He also said no income tax increases -- - BULLSHIET

All the millions of foreclosures are INCREASING INCOME TAXES FOR ALL THOSE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

All those past homeowners now have NO REAL TAX WRITE OFFS for their homes and property taxes - Which are or were, Most Americans main income tax write offs.

So millions of tax paying past homeowners will be paying billions of dollars more in income taxes for Obama and the rest to feed on !!!!

His speech was SHARP & SMART -

SHARP & SMART LIKE A FOX<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
 

ama125

LoanSafe Member
hmmm

2MP requires a HAMP mod first on 1st. It would be nice if they did ahead of HAMP. Or, for all the folks that were denied HAMP but instead got a similar inhouse mod, but not HAMP. My concern was the internal would not qualify for 2MP now that at least it has one participant. I also have a 2nd with BofA (previously Countrywide, previously Citi which has my 1st).
Dave - got my nego on the phone yesterday. Being told now that despite passing the NPV test he did in Oct, the one that the "MHA team" uses is different and that I failed that NPV test and thus no longer qualify for HAMP on the first. WTF?! I have a Fannie Mae backed loan on the first. My understanding is that HAMP should be pursued and only becomes an issue if principal forbearance would result in LTV below 100% per Fannie guidelines. Guess what? No mention of any principal forbearance so seems to me regardless of pass/fail, I should still qualify for HAMP. They are offering a HAMP-like in-house mod, supposedly with the same terms. All good and fine but the in-house offer on the second mortgage is crap! Only offering to reduce interest rate from 6.75 to 6% with a $90/mo reduction in payment! I noted that I should receive a borrower notice on failing the NPV with the input values. Hope they are not trying to get out of doing 2MP mods now just because they signed up for it. Getting ticked off to say the least! Hoping to dispute the NPV test and raise hell on not complying with Fannie guidelines. Any input? Thanks!
 

davephx

LoanSafe Member
ama125- I agree with your conclusions. At least Citi (edit oops your CW which is not known for good internals) now has an internal that is similar often given vs most of the others that have worse alternatives if any.

But the NPV test change from pass to fail for HAMP is huge concern. Especially when Fannie is SUPPOSE to be good to have and should be in the forefront of getting HAMPs done.
 

davephx

LoanSafe Member
THANKS2U

What other than lip service can a President do? He has no power to even introduce a bill in the Congress. He has spoken strongly about foreclosures in the past and Treasury has done a lot to try and make more happen but with no enforcement.

Probably some more support by R's (who can block anything) for jobs idea especially since most like all tax deductions especially for the rich.

The taxes foreclosed may pay on forgiven debt (no tax if overall insolvent) is really not a tax increase it has been in the tax law for about ever.

The truth on taxes is 95%+ got a small tax cut as part of the stimulas program and under House Health care only on joint incomes of over $1 million is what the R's are all upset about.

Other prosals may go down to "ony" $250k of income. Those that benefited the most from our system and decades of among the lowest tax rates in the world and historically so low.
 

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
THANKS2U

What other than lip service can a President do? He has no power to even introduce a bill in the Congress. He has spoken strongly about foreclosures in the past and Treasury has done a lot to try and make more happen but with no enforcement.

Probably some more support by R's (who can block anything) for jobs idea especially since most like all tax deductions especially for the rich.

The taxes foreclosed may pay on forgiven debt (no tax if overall insolvent) is really not a tax increase it has been in the tax law for about ever.

The truth on taxes is 95%+ got a small tax cut as part of the stimulas program and under House Health care only on joint incomes of over $1 million is what the R's are all upset about.

Other prosals may go down to "ony" $250k of income. Those that benefited the most from our system and decades of among the lowest tax rates in the world and historically so low.
Davephx

They all can do a lot more other than lip service -

They are all political ACTORS on a stage of deception..

Regarding INCOME TAXES -

Common Dave - Taxes 101 -

Any tax paying citizen, who does not own a home andthus is excluded from having the mortgage interest write offs and the property Taxes write off, absolutely gets BFUUCKKKEED OVER and has a higher income tax inflcited upon them as a Non Homeowner -

End of story
 

THANKS2U

LoanSafe Member
Dave - Here is 1 thing the Pres could do

The Fix


There recently was an article in the St. Petersburg Fl. Times. The Business Section asked readers for ideas on:




"How Would You Fix the Economy?"
I think this guy nailed it!
_____

Dear Mr. President,

Please find below my suggestion for fixing America 's economy. Instead of giving billions of dollars to companies that will squander the money on lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan. You can call it the
"Patriotic Retirement Plan":

There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force.



Pay them $1 million apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:

1) They MUST retire.



Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.

2) They MUST buy a new American CAR.



Forty million cars ordered Auto Industry fixed.

3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage



Housing Crisis fixed.

It can't get any easier than that!!

P.S. If more money is needed, have
ALL MEMBERS in Congress pay their taxes...

Mr. President, while you're at it, make
Congress retire on Social Security and Medicare.



I'll bet both programs would be fixed pronto!



If you think this would work, please forward to everyone you know.

So Simplistic and Yet So True
 

AzGryffindor

LoanSafe Member
Any tax paying citizen, who does not own a home andthus is excluded from having the mortgage interest write offs and the property Taxes write off, absolutely gets BFUUCKKKEED OVER and has a higher income tax inflcited upon them as a Non Homeowner -

End of story
Actually, we've been claiming the standard deduction for the past few years since it is higher than itemizing. Even when we were paying our full mortgage amount there simply wasn't enough interest to itemize.

Those of us lucky enough to receive permanent mods will see that interest write off become even lower as the majority of people seem to be getting the floor interest rate of 2% and then stepping up to 5%. Unless you have a large loan, I don't think many are going to actually benefit from the ability to write off your mortgage interest as there just won't be enough to justify itemizing.

Property taxes, up to 1000 for a married couple, are now added on top of your standard deduction making it even higher.
 
Top